Warlocks VS Mage, the old debate

Eh locks arent necasarely better then a mage...all depends on the user and its build...OK... for however said that mages last as long as raids as locks... sorry to tell you but HELL NO!!! Locks have drain life and drain mana, soulstone, healthstone, and a freaking pet that can either tank, dps, rienforce, or even just look hot. locks that are aff that go in pvp and dot and run... those deserve to die. I do agree though that a good mages vs a good warlock is always chosen by who got lucky that time. The thing though is that locks have fear.... fear makes it so you run around and the lock has 10 seconds to kill you with the dps and damage. Mages have poly which heal the apponent... Also everyone knows that lock's gear have int and stamina while mages get the same but cut in half the stats cause blizz thinks that mages need spirit... which quite frankly angeres me cause that means blizz thinks that mages are willing to wait for their mana to regain, other then to just create some water (which any shitty or good mage does b4 anything) and drink it... COME ON!!! btw locks aswell if you have noticed always get the sweetest looking gear =). I just hate it how mages are starting to look like demented star trek freaks... that is all. also for huntas i heard that they are going to get rid of the "dead zone" so then others can freeze'em and pwn them. Btw i think that was long due, because just go to the armoury and look at the amount of huntas in the arena teams, and then connect the dots. ^.^ ( got a hunta buddy who loves that idea and he says "!@#$ YA")ok,a few weeks back, my freind had a lvl 39 lock, and i was a 37 mage (Now lvl 56) all i did was hit her with counterspell to silence her, then i morphed her, then i smacked her silly with a 4 hit combo    Pyroblast, fireball, fire blast fire balSorry, not exactly true... Blizzard does not believe that mages are gna stand there and wait for mana. Basically the spirit (On raid sets especially!) is for a bigger evocation. It is true that this is a stupid reason to sacrifice stam and int on items but yeah those are just my 50 Cents. Warlock vs. Mage? Id say both should not have problems running out of mana at all in raids and a mage can easily outdps a lock. In pvp tho blizz recently made Polymorph the worst CC spell instead of the best  as it was before. It now lasts as long as a fear but still heals the opponent and does not give mages the ability to actually damage the sheep. GG blizz, locks now have an 80%% chance to win against mages in pvp. And btw about the guy saying he killed his lock friend at lvl 47. well you used counterspell, but i wonder what his felhunter did while you casted pyro... and in case he didnt have his felhunter out while dueling you, well i guess then you shouldnt be too happy winning against a nub. EDIT: sorry bout that its lvl 37 and not 47 xD Heya guyz!First of all.....mages are tough characters...he can deal a very big amount of damage right away...locks have damage overtime with theyr curses...if played right a mage can kick a locks ass over the moon!Don't forget that mages have frost nova...and btw to cast it again in a short period of time,mages have Cold Snap(if u don't know what that is,find out for yourself)   Second of all...mages have blink...so he can run from the locks pet very easy(after frost nova i mean).u should try it because mages are realy hard to kill(if u know how to play it).   Respect to all of you...Respect to Blizzard...WoW is the the most beautiful MMORPG of this centuryif you know what the hell your doing on a mage and you have a good build ... but if you suck and against a good lock then ur fucked but there is telling how long i can be dueling a good 39 twink lock ... butt over all i choose a mage .. you can get a pet as a lokk and youll probably die alot less cuase ur pet can get aggro but still uyou can kill faster on a mage.. but at high lvl you can stealth on a mage ... and that can make  a mage kick asscant sheep demons so you have to sheep the lock its kinda bull s**tDamn,man!Poly the loc